Rewording Tool vs Scribbr: Which Rewording Tool Gives Cleaner, Academic-Safe Results?
I tested Rewording Tool and Scribbr myself—here’s which one gives clearer, more natural, and academic-safe rewrites in 2025. See my real results.
Scribbr is recognized in the academic community for its proofreading services and safe rewriting options that prevent plagiarism. In 2025–2026, I've seen that new tools like Rewording Tool are gaining popularity.
They are especially appealing to students looking for clear, natural, and safe rewritten text without having to pay each time they use it. "I tested both platforms myself to clearly see the difference."
Rewriting vs Academic Rewording — What I Noticed While Testing
Before comparing both tools, I generated a poorly written 100-word paragraph on "SEO Strategies to Become #1 on Google" to use as my test sample.
Here is an AI generated paragraph using ChatGPT:
Here’s the difference I focused on:
Paraphrasing
Replacing words with synonyms but keeping the meaning.
Rewording
Improving clarity, tone, structure, and fluency—not just swapping words.
Scribbr is designed mainly for academic-safe rewriting.
Rewording Tool is designed for clarity + tone + humanlike rewriting.
So the real question for me was:
Which tool gives cleaner, safer rewriting—especially for academic use?
I tested both side by side.
My Experience With Scribbr’s Rewording Tool
Scribbr’s tool is made for academic use, and that shows clearly:
What I noticed:
✔ Clean and professional interface
✔ Easy to paste text and generate results
✔ Designed for avoiding plagiarism and academic risks
✔ Output is formal and structured
But Scribbr’s rewriting sometimes felt:
- too strict
- too formal
- slightly robotic
- limited in modes
- slower in rewriting
It’s useful for students who want a safe, formal rewrite—but not always the most natural or readable.
(I will attach screenshots here.)
My Experience With Rewording Tool (rewording-tool.com)
Using Rewording Tool felt lighter, faster, and more natural.
What stood out while I tested it:
✔ Clean, distraction-free design
✔ No login or subscription
✔ You paste text → select mode → get results instantly
✔ Very humanlike rewriting that keeps the meaning
✔ More flexibility compared to Scribbr
✔ Useful for both academic and non-academic writing
The tone stays natural without sounding robotic, and it does not overcomplicate sentences.
(I will attach screenshots here.)
Feature Comparison (Based on Real Testing)
|
Feature |
Rewording Tool |
Scribbr |
|
User Interface |
Clean, simple, ad-free |
Professional, academic-focused |
|
Free Word Limit |
250 words |
125–150 words |
|
Premium Word Limit |
1000+ words |
~300–500 words |
|
Rewriting Modes |
10+ modes (Standard, First Person, Formal, Fluency, Humanize, Creative, Professional, Academic, Casual, Informal) |
1 main academic rewording mode |
|
Language Support |
25+ languages |
8–10 languages |
|
Humanize Mode |
Yes |
No dedicated mode |
|
Grammar Fixing |
Automatic |
Yes |
|
Expand Text |
Yes |
No |
|
Shorten Text |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Best For |
Students, bloggers, professionals, content creators |
Academic work, citations, plagiarism-safe rewriting |
|
Usage |
Unlimited free usage |
Limited free usage |
The Rewording Tool had more options, more modes, and better flexibility overall.
My Real Test: Rewording Tool vs Scribbr Output
I pasted the same “SEO Strategies to Become #1 on Google” paragraph into both tools.
Scribbr’s rewriting tool has a simple interface. I chose the Standard mode and clicked the Rephrase button, and the results appeared quickly. It also highlights different areas so you can easily modify words as many times as you want.
After getting Scribbr’s rewritten paragraph, I checked its AI percentage. I prefer QuillBot’s AI detector because it reliably shows whether the content is written by an AI tool or a human. Here are the results:
Quillbot declared the scribbers rephrasing content 100% AI likely written and AI generated.
Scribbr’s Output — My Observations
✔ Meaning is preserved
✔ Very formal
✔ Clearly academic-focused
But…
✖ Sentences were long and rigid
✖ Felt slightly robotic
✖ Not great for casual or creative writing
✖ Reduced readability 100% AI generated
✖ 100% AI generated
Scribbr is safe for academic work, but not ideal for AI free content.
Rewording Tool’s Output — My Observations
After entering the ChatGPT paragraph into the rewording tool for natural paraphrasing, here are the results:
After getting the rewording tool results, I ran the paragraph through QuillBot, just as I did for Scribbr. I was truly amazed that QuillBot showed that 0% of the text is likely AI-generated. This output is ideal for students as well as professionals in writing-related fields who are looking to get AI-free content quickly.
✔ More natural
✔ Clearer meaning
✔ Simple and clean tone
✔ Better flow
✔ More readable
✔ Humanlike structure
It took 1–2 seconds longer than Scribbr, but the quality was much clearer.
ChatGPT Comparison of Both Outputs
To confirm my results, I asked ChatGPT to analyze both rewritten texts.
Here’s what it concluded:
|
Metric |
Scribbr |
Rewording Tool |
Winner |
|
Clarity |
Solid but formal |
Very clear |
Rewording Tool |
|
Tone |
Academic, stiff |
Natural & clean |
Rewording Tool |
|
Grammar |
Correct but rigid |
Smooth & flexible |
Rewording Tool |
|
Flow |
Slightly uneven |
Consistent & connected |
Rewording Tool |
|
Humanlike |
Robotic at times |
Very humanlike |
Rewording Tool |
Rewording Tool won in every major category.
Final Verdict (My Personal Experience)
The results are unbelievable. A tool ranking in the 3rd position on SERPs was detected as AI-generated content, while the rewording tool that struggles to appear in SERPs showed 0% AI and 100% human-written results. This is an amazing and surprising finding.
If you want rewriting that feels:
✔ human
✔ natural
✔ clear
✔ easy to read
✔ suitable for both academic and non-academic writing then Rewording Tool is a stronger choice.
It’s simple, fast, free, and gives you more flexibility for real-world writing.